<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: LGBT youth group CEO under scrutiny</title> <atom:link href="http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/</link> <description>Carolina LGBT arts, entertainment, news, views</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Trent Filmore</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link> <dc:creator>Trent Filmore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:27:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.q-notes.com/?p=361#comment-226</guid> <description>As a former youth of this organization, I find it sad that something like this has happened. I remember Tonda and the staff that worked there were people that loved their jobs and helped youth (like myself)finally become comfortable with themselves. I understand there&#039;s two sides to every argument, but to suggest to have someone there that will argue about homsexuality being a sin is not a conversation that some young teen who has just come to terms with the fact they they could possibly be gay needs to hear. TOY was a safe space where youth could be comfortable with themselves and for atleast acouple of hours a week let there &quot;hair&quot; down and not have to worry about the harsh world waiting for them outside that space, and it should remain a safe space for them. Anyone whether a youth or a member of staff should respect that. If Eustache is homophobic, or just clearly in the dark about LGBT issues, her resume dosen&#039;t seem to show any experience working with at-risk youth, just non-profit organizations. So why is she working with them?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former youth of this organization, I find it sad that something like this has happened. I remember Tonda and the staff that worked there were people that loved their jobs and helped youth (like myself)finally become comfortable with themselves. I understand there&#8217;s two sides to every argument, but to suggest to have someone there that will argue about homsexuality being a sin is not a conversation that some young teen who has just come to terms with the fact they they could possibly be gay needs to hear. TOY was a safe space where youth could be comfortable with themselves and for atleast acouple of hours a week let there &#8220;hair&#8221; down and not have to worry about the harsh world waiting for them outside that space, and it should remain a safe space for them. Anyone whether a youth or a member of staff should respect that. If Eustache is homophobic, or just clearly in the dark about LGBT issues, her resume dosen&#8217;t seem to show any experience working with at-risk youth, just non-profit organizations. So why is she working with them?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.q-notes.com/?p=361#comment-220</guid> <description>As a youth member of TOY I can say this much…Eustache has had an excellent background in the field of non profit work and working for youth. One thing to be recognized is that she has not worked WITH the youth. This alone brought about a lot of the troubles that has been caused with Time Out. Anouther thing that should be recognized is that Eustache has had NO previous experience when working with an LGBT community. A lot of volunteers and other youth members are not even aware of this controversial situation that has been going on. Only a few determined and involved youth who are devoted to TOY have had these issues with Eustache, however, they are very true. The board is doing a full on investigation and speaking to several key people who are involved with Eustache that were volunteers, interns, or staff. And a lot of consistencies have been found about Eustache’s way of leadership that is not acceptable at TOY. The board can also partially be blamed for some of the problems that have been caused by Eustache for not setting her expectations correctly upon being hired. The youth who spoke out chose to remain Anonymous (as have I) because Eustache can have the potential to retaliate, not on a professional level, but personally she can. And when rationally thinking (or irrationally) from a personal youth’s opinion, Eustache would probably be best suited not to work for Time Out any longer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a youth member of TOY I can say this much…</p><p>Eustache has had an excellent background in the field of non profit work and working for youth. One thing to be recognized is that she has not worked WITH the youth. This alone brought about a lot of the troubles that has been caused with Time Out. Anouther thing that should be recognized is that Eustache has had NO previous experience when working with an LGBT community. A lot of volunteers and other youth members are not even aware of this controversial situation that has been going on. Only a few determined and involved youth who are devoted to TOY have had these issues with Eustache, however, they are very true. The board is doing a full on investigation and speaking to several key people who are involved with Eustache that were volunteers, interns, or staff. And a lot of consistencies have been found about Eustache’s way of leadership that is not acceptable at TOY. The board can also partially be blamed for some of the problems that have been caused by Eustache for not setting her expectations correctly upon being hired. The youth who spoke out chose to remain Anonymous (as have I) because Eustache can have the potential to retaliate, not on a professional level, but personally she can. And when rationally thinking (or irrationally) from a personal youth’s opinion, Eustache would probably be best suited not to work for Time Out any longer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cleo</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link> <dc:creator>cleo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:54:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.q-notes.com/?p=361#comment-218</guid> <description>It&#039;s very easy to discount something when it&#039;s a he-said-she-said situation. The board should try a find a way to investigate beyond that, because it sounds like Eustache wanted the job, said whatever she had to say to get hired, and she&#039;ll probably continue doing this with the board - regardless of how it affects the youth who come in for help.However, distancing oneself from the place you work is a sign you shouldn&#039;t be working there in the first place. At the very least she needs a heavy dose of education in LGBT issues.The bottom line is - is she serving the LGBT youth that come in for help. If the people the organization serves don&#039;t feel comfortable with her, then she should not be there. And if the board members can&#039;t (or don&#039;t want to) see past this, maybe they shouldn&#039;t be on the board.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very easy to discount something when it&#8217;s a he-said-she-said situation. The board should try a find a way to investigate beyond that, because it sounds like Eustache wanted the job, said whatever she had to say to get hired, and she&#8217;ll probably continue doing this with the board &#8211; regardless of how it affects the youth who come in for help.</p><p>However, distancing oneself from the place you work is a sign you shouldn&#8217;t be working there in the first place. At the very least she needs a heavy dose of education in LGBT issues.</p><p>The bottom line is &#8211; is she serving the LGBT youth that come in for help. If the people the organization serves don&#8217;t feel comfortable with her, then she should not be there. And if the board members can&#8217;t (or don&#8217;t want to) see past this, maybe they shouldn&#8217;t be on the board.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: atswim2boys</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link> <dc:creator>atswim2boys</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.q-notes.com/?p=361#comment-213</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/Charlotte-Pride-t29496.html&amp;st=580&amp;p=985899#entry985899&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;From the interwebs&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;em&gt;Qnotes has a disturbing cover story in the current edition. The leader of Time Out Youth (TOY) has been accused of being grossly insensitive and borderline bigoted toward group members. Mindboggling to me. The kid&#039;s indentities were left out of the article for fear of retaliation from Janine Eustache, the current leader. Allegations include her prohibiting the word &quot;gay&quot; used around her children when they visit the office. Also, questioning whether these kids truly are LGBTQ and claims from others that she doesn&#039;t tell anyone including friends and family where she works, allegedly because she is ashamed. Anectdotally, I attend many meetings of the gay Charlotte Business Guild. CBG has supported TOY through fundraisers. Janine is often there but I have noticed that she almost always stands just outside of the main room of the VanLandingham House. Half hidden, like she does not want to sit in the main area and be considered part of the group. Pictures are sometimes taken. Just my personal recollection, but it certainly fits the pattern of the article. Eustache is straight btw.I have never believed leaders of gay organizations have to be gay. Often a straight face to the world can be helpful in pushing our goals forward because it does not seem so alien to the general public. However, in this case Eustache apparently lacks any sensitivity at all. Granted this article was one sided. These are allegations at this point and it&#039;s only fair that Janine be able to give her side. Unfortunately, neither Eustache nor the Board answered any relevant questions sent by Qnotes. Instead they circled the wagons and accused Qnotes staff falsely of infiltrating as members to undermine the group through their newspaper. Personally, I don&#039;t think the kids featured in this story would have come forward for no reason at all. I am familiar with people involved in TOY, not to a deep degree but they have always been aboveboard and great representatives of our community. Finally, if the Board and Eustache had nothing to hide why stonewall and refuse to answer direct questions? TOY&#039;s mission is too important and these kids are too emotionally fragile to be abused by someone who is supposed to be their advocate. The thought of it is sickening. I hope outside pressure continues to be put on Eustache and the Board to come clean and if any of these incidents are confirmed, Eustache needs to be thrown out along with the Board members that covered for her.&lt;/em&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/Charlotte-Pride-t29496.html&amp;st=580&amp;p=985899#entry985899" rel="nofollow">From the interwebs</a>:</p><p><em>Qnotes has a disturbing cover story in the current edition. The leader of Time Out Youth (TOY) has been accused of being grossly insensitive and borderline bigoted toward group members. Mindboggling to me. The kid&#8217;s indentities were left out of the article for fear of retaliation from Janine Eustache, the current leader. Allegations include her prohibiting the word &#8220;gay&#8221; used around her children when they visit the office. Also, questioning whether these kids truly are LGBTQ and claims from others that she doesn&#8217;t tell anyone including friends and family where she works, allegedly because she is ashamed. Anectdotally, I attend many meetings of the gay Charlotte Business Guild. CBG has supported TOY through fundraisers. Janine is often there but I have noticed that she almost always stands just outside of the main room of the VanLandingham House. Half hidden, like she does not want to sit in the main area and be considered part of the group. Pictures are sometimes taken. Just my personal recollection, but it certainly fits the pattern of the article. Eustache is straight btw.</p><p>I have never believed leaders of gay organizations have to be gay. Often a straight face to the world can be helpful in pushing our goals forward because it does not seem so alien to the general public. However, in this case Eustache apparently lacks any sensitivity at all. Granted this article was one sided. These are allegations at this point and it&#8217;s only fair that Janine be able to give her side. Unfortunately, neither Eustache nor the Board answered any relevant questions sent by Qnotes. Instead they circled the wagons and accused Qnotes staff falsely of infiltrating as members to undermine the group through their newspaper. Personally, I don&#8217;t think the kids featured in this story would have come forward for no reason at all. I am familiar with people involved in TOY, not to a deep degree but they have always been aboveboard and great representatives of our community. Finally, if the Board and Eustache had nothing to hide why stonewall and refuse to answer direct questions? TOY&#8217;s mission is too important and these kids are too emotionally fragile to be abused by someone who is supposed to be their advocate. The thought of it is sickening. I hope outside pressure continues to be put on Eustache and the Board to come clean and if any of these incidents are confirmed, Eustache needs to be thrown out along with the Board members that covered for her.</em></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Claudia Zacchara</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link> <dc:creator>Claudia Zacchara</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:01:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.q-notes.com/?p=361#comment-212</guid> <description>Why would the Board of  Time Out Youth  allow Ms.Eustache to Change their Business cards  as to not  reflect their  mission statement .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the Board of  Time Out Youth  allow Ms.Eustache to Change their Business cards  as to not  reflect their  mission statement .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raine</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/361/lgbt-youth-group-ceo-under-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link> <dc:creator>Raine</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:22:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.q-notes.com/?p=361#comment-211</guid> <description>These allegations are profoundly disturbing. Sadly I have heard some of these very same rumblings myself.The mission statement of Time Out Youth is clear: &quot;A support, advocacy and education organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth...&quot;There is nothing in that mission statement that indicates there is any sort of &quot;faith based&quot; aspect of the organization. Attempting to sneak it in in the form of a prayer line, speakers promoting opposing religious viewpoints or any of the other &quot;traditional&quot; methods employed by non-affirming groups is shameful.Furthermore the TOY web site proudly proclaims that they provide an environment that is safe and &quot;free from judgment and condemndation&quot; and that they choose to &quot;...show love and support...by extending our hand in the spirit of acceptance...&quot;For the CEO of such an organization to feel she has one scintilla of authority to challenge the validity of anyone&#039;s sexual orientation smacks of ignorance, intolerance and prejudice.To forbid giving out their telephone number on a radio show during an interview where the organization was discussed and to omit the mission statement from her business card are additional causes for concern.I certainly hope the Board of Directors will take this matter seriously and conduct a true investigation rather than a cursory one.As a community we need to hold TOY and their board accountable. We need to make sure this matter is not swept under the rainbow carpet and into the closet.We are not talking about just an organization here, we are talking about our youth.Remember how it was when YOU were trying to come to terms with who you are? I certainly do and there was no such resource available to me. TOY must be preserved and, if need be, cleaned out and restaffed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These allegations are profoundly disturbing. Sadly I have heard some of these very same rumblings myself.</p><p>The mission statement of Time Out Youth is clear: &#8220;A support, advocacy and education organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>There is nothing in that mission statement that indicates there is any sort of &#8220;faith based&#8221; aspect of the organization. Attempting to sneak it in in the form of a prayer line, speakers promoting opposing religious viewpoints or any of the other &#8220;traditional&#8221; methods employed by non-affirming groups is shameful.</p><p>Furthermore the TOY web site proudly proclaims that they provide an environment that is safe and &#8220;free from judgment and condemndation&#8221; and that they choose to &#8220;&#8230;show love and support&#8230;by extending our hand in the spirit of acceptance&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>For the CEO of such an organization to feel she has one scintilla of authority to challenge the validity of anyone&#8217;s sexual orientation smacks of ignorance, intolerance and prejudice.</p><p>To forbid giving out their telephone number on a radio show during an interview where the organization was discussed and to omit the mission statement from her business card are additional causes for concern.</p><p>I certainly hope the Board of Directors will take this matter seriously and conduct a true investigation rather than a cursory one.</p><p>As a community we need to hold TOY and their board accountable. We need to make sure this matter is not swept under the rainbow carpet and into the closet.</p><p>We are not talking about just an organization here, we are talking about our youth.</p><p>Remember how it was when YOU were trying to come to terms with who you are? I certainly do and there was no such resource available to me. TOY must be preserved and, if need be, cleaned out and restaffed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.039 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.q-notes.com @ 2012-02-08 00:23:10 -->
